Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!ukma!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner
From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Comm Toolbox TCPtool documentation
Message-ID: <1991Mar15.033323.19357@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 15 Mar 91 03:33:23 GMT
References: <9263@etsu.CMI.COM>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at U-C
Lines: 10

In article <9263@etsu.CMI.COM> kevinh@cmi.com (Kevin Hegg) writes:
>I am developing a networked application and considering whether to use the 
>Comm Toolbox or not. I would like to be able to support ADSP or TCP/IP.

I would suggest you make your application switchable between MacTCP
and the Comm Toolbox.  This will save your MacTCP users from having to
deal with the Comm Toolbox until a few more kinks get ironed out.
--
Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office
Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu  UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner