Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brtph3!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request
From: jcs@cbnewsb.cb.att.com (John "C". Sucilla)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: Re: Turning off monitors
Keywords: Hardware
Message-ID: <1863@brchh104.bnr.ca>
Date: 15 Mar 91 22:44:00 GMT
Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca
Organization: Sun-Spots
Lines: 23
Approved: Sun-Spots@rice.edu
X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 91 01:47:29 GMT
X-Sun-Spots-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 47, message 17
X-Note: Submissions: sun-spots@rice.edu, Admin: sun-spots-request@rice.edu

>[[Ed's Note: Turning off your system monitor has no effect on the actual
>CPU (unless it's a VT100 hooked up as a console :) :)); however, turning
>it on and off will probably reduce the lifetime of your monitors. It seems
>like this was discussed once in Sunspots, but I can't find the issues :(.
>-bdg]]

I'm interested in the cost differential between leaving the monitors on
after hours vs. power clearing them when you go home.  Obviously the
electric bill will be lower when they are powered down every night but is
that cheaper in the long run than having to pay the cost of repairs (or
replacement) of monitors that die from frequent power cycling?  has anyone
done any research on this?  Are there any published papers that can be
snarfed?  

Hopefully, the research would include fire hazard data for monitors that
are allowed to be powered up all night with nobody around to see them
catch on fire.  I mean, how often does that *really* happen?  I've known
of two that went up in smoke and flames in the last 14 years or so but
I've heard of a couple more.

                AT&T Bell Laboratories, Naperville Il.
JC Sucilla      IX Room 1F-210, (708) 979-0599
                jcs@ixstar.att.com