Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!ames!mindcraft.com!karish
From: karish@mindcraft.com (Chuck Karish)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: SVVS requires a panic?  Was: Re: CRASH your TANDEM :
Message-ID: <669239249.25261@mindcraft.com>
Date: 17 Mar 91 19:47:26 GMT
References: <6685@auspex.auspex.com>
Organization: Mindcraft, Inc.
Lines: 13

In article <6685@auspex.auspex.com> guy@auspex.auspex.com (Guy Harris) writes:
>AT&T has
>done some bogus things in the SVVS [ ... ] , but
>requiring that the system *panic* wasn't one of them, at least not in
>the version of the SVVS I've seen.

It sounded sort of odd to me at the time.  Perhaps I misunderstood.

The actual capabilities of Tandem's systems also sounded wildly
improbable to one who's used to less-robust implementations.

	Chuck Karish		karish@mindcraft.com
	Mindcraft, Inc.		(415) 323-9000