Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!romp!auschs!awdprime!greenber.austin.ibm.com!jfh From: jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F Haugh II) Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix Subject: Re: AIX Group ID's query Message-ID: <5950@awdprime.UUCP> Date: 15 Mar 91 19:15:21 GMT References: Sender: news@awdprime.UUCP Organization: Obfuscated Features "R" Us, LCC Austin Lines: 27 In article seb1525@mvs.draper.com ("Stephen E. Bacher") writes: >We are trying to implement a networkwide standard for Un*x UID and GID >numbers (mainly for NFS). Since most users added on Suns (the bulk of >our workstation population) have a group ID of 10 (staff), we think it >would be reasonable to give our AIX users the same one. Unfortunately >the makers of AIX think that group 10 should be "audit". My question: >Just what effects exactly does the group classification have? Who, if >anyone, cares about what the groups "mean" on AIX? Is it best to edit >/etc/group to change the designations? What, if anything, will break? There are very few "reserved" GID values in AIX v3, and 10 isn't one of them. The GID for "audit" can be just about anything, within reason. You have to remember to search the filesystem for any files belonging to group "audit" before you run off and change the GID in the /etc/group file. Nothing should "break" if you change the value and change the file group IDs. There is a "chgroup" command that will do this, and there should even be a SMIT panel for this as well. [ Neither change the file GIDs, tho ] I would suggest that you use SMIT as it "knows" about the various /etc/security files that are affected. -- John F. Haugh II | I've Been Moved | MaBellNet: (512) 838-4340 SneakerNet: 809/1D064 | AGAIN ! | VNET: LCCB386 at AUSVMQ BangNet: ..!cs.utexas.edu!ibmchs!auschs!snowball.austin.ibm.com!jfh (e-i-e-i-o)