Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!ucsd!dog.ee.lbl.gov!elf.ee.lbl.gov!torek
From: torek@elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Regular FSCK Required ?
Keywords: fsck cron
Message-ID: <11004@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
Date: 15 Mar 91 20:58:00 GMT
References: <1235@cnw01.storesys.coles.oz.au> <1991Mar8.040254.16272@tvcent.uucp> <166@heurikon.heurikon.com> <1991Mar15.095247.13441@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>
Reply-To: torek@elf.ee.lbl.gov (Chris Torek)
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley
Lines: 14
X-Local-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 91 12:58:00 PST

In article <1991Mar15.095247.13441@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>
mouse@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (der Mouse) writes:
>Unfortunately this is not always what you want.  I would *really* like
>an option to fsck that automatically answers "yes" to "CONTINUE?"
>messages and "no" to all others.

``When this baby hits 88 miles an hour ...''  vroooOOOM <crackle> <fssss>

D 5.9   87/03/11 20:06:28       karels  16      15      00018/00010/00428
use physical sector size for partial buffer reads;
-n implies "yes" answer for "CONTINUE?"
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Lawrence Berkeley Lab CSE/EE (+1 415 486 5427)
Berkeley, CA		Domain:	torek@ee.lbl.gov