Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!bu.edu!wang!saturn!martin
From: martin@saturn.uucp (Martin J. Schedlbauer)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Esix verses the rest of 386-unix
Message-ID: <1991Mar16.132118.309@saturn.uucp>
Date: 16 Mar 91 13:21:18 GMT
References: <293@rancor.UUCP> <1991Mar10.211104.9790@cimcor.mn.org> <294@rancor.UUCP>
Reply-To: martin@saturn.UUCP (Martin J. Schedlbauer)
Organization: Martin Schedlbauer, Billerica, MA 01862 (USA)
Lines: 22

In article <294@rancor.UUCP> bob@rancor.UUCP (Bob Willcox) writes:
>In article <1991Mar10.211104.9790@cimcor.mn.org> mike@cimcor.mn.org (Michael Grenier) writes:
>
>Since I only use FFS, I set NBUF low (100, probably could have gone
>lower though) since I don't think they are being used.  (Does anyone
>know if the 1KB buffers are ever used if you don't have any S51K 
>filesystems?)
>

I once tried to set that value to about 30 (Esix) and then the system wouldn't
boot. It seems that during the initial boot it uses some of these buffers. I
guess there was a reason why the Esix folks set it the minumum to 100 in mtune:)

	...Martin



-- 
==============================================================================
Martin J. Schedlbauer	| martin@saturn.UUCP	| ...!ulowell!saturn!martin
8 Gilman Road		| mschedlb@ulowell.edu	| ...!uunet!wang!saturn!martin
Billerica, MA 01862 USA	| CIS: 76675, 3364	| /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\