Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!ogicse!milton!mtv
From: mtv@milton.u.washington.edu (David Schanen)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: Korn shell on sco
Keywords: KSH
Message-ID: <18356@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 14 Mar 91 01:18:55 GMT
References: <307@secola.Columbia.NCR.COM> <1991Mar13.120857.12127@mack.uit.no>
Organization: I'm working on it...
Lines: 21

In article <1991Mar13.120857.12127@mack.uit.no> thostr@stud.cs.uit.no (Thomas Strandenaes) writes:
>
>Get the Bourne Again SHell, BASH, from GNU. Of course, you'll need the 
>devsys to get this think working. Mail gnu@prep.ai.mit.edu
>
 
   I have heard that KSH is superior to BASH, any opinions from those in the 
know?  

   Also a devsys is not necessary to utilize BASH, I have it running now.  I 
would be interested in trying KSH.  All I need is *one* person using Xenix386
to uuencode it and send it to me and I will be off and running... 

   Wait!  Please send mail first, if you do have it to send, so my mail box 
doesn't go over my quota limit :)

	Thanks, 
		-Dave
-- 

 Inet: mtv@milton.u.washington.edu  * 8kyu *  UUNET: ...uunet!uw-beaver!u!mtv