Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet
From: mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Interlaced monitors
Message-ID: <1991Mar15.144911.19156@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 15 Mar 91 02:38:40 GMT
References: <1991Mar15.023840.28733@rti.rti.org> <6919@mace.cc.purdue.edu> <1991Mar6.174932.14469@cbnews.att.com> <70457004@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 17


In article <1991Mar15.023840.28733@rti.rti.org> bcw@rti.rti.org (Bruce Wright) writes:
>
>We didn't attempt to do a controlled study, but I suspect that
>there is a significant difference between individuals either in 
>basic visual perception or in the psychological reaction to the
>stimulus.  It doesn't particularly matter which as far as the
>reaction goes - it bothered some people much more than others.
>

That may be true. Otherwise I find it hard to explain the UTTERLY EXCRABLE
television format used in Europe. When in Europe I have literally been
unable to watch television - it flickers so horribly that I get
a terrible headache. 


Doug McDonald