Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.nfs:1993 comp.windows.ms:10401 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:5196 Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!appserv!sun!amdcad!brahms!phil From: phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.windows.ms,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc Subject: Re: Sun PC-NFS deficiencies Message-ID: <1991Mar16.014014.20399@amd.com> Date: 16 Mar 91 01:40:14 GMT References: <1991Mar13.180625.14540@amd.com> <1991Mar14.194005.19662@ericsson.se> Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting) Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc; Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 18 In article <1991Mar14.194005.19662@ericsson.se> etxsral@california.ericsson.se (Lars Nilsson) writes: |Here is my opinion about PC-NFS versus Novell: | |PC-NFS,PC-TCP etc is not meant to be a full-blown PC-network. That's what I've been trying to say. Sun PC-NFS is NO NETWORK in the PC world. |PC-NFS and PC-TCP is configured in a more unix-like way this |makes it easier for the Unix-system managers to configure |the PC's Yeah, who cares about the users? -- The government is not your mother. The government doesn't love you.