Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi
From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Microsoft C 5.10
Message-ID: <1991Mar16.191647.2125@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Date: 16 Mar 91 19:16:47 GMT
References: <1573@msa3b.UUCP>
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Lines: 14

From article <1573@msa3b.UUCP>, by kevin@msa3b.UUCP (Kevin P. Kleinfelter):
> boyd_m@intertel.UUCP (Mark Boyd) writes:
> 
> On a typical program I get
>     Microsoft C 6.0 .EXE: 142000 bytes
>     Borland C++ .EXE:     000000 bytes
			    ^^^^^^   Whew!!! Not bad optimization :-)


|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.)	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|