Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!ukma!rex!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnews!cbnews!military
From: smpod@saturn.lerc.nasa.gov (Stefan)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: re: Equipment Comparison
Message-ID: <1991Mar15.034121.6659@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 15 Mar 91 03:41:21 GMT
References: <1991Mar12.233727.1299@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (william.b.thacker)
Organization: NASA/LeRC
Lines: 12
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: smpod@saturn.lerc.nasa.gov (Stefan)
In Eric_S_Klien@cup.portal.com writes...
>Preliminary analysis shows that the 
>imprecise B-52s had almost zero effect in the war.  

Where did you get this info?

I read (NYT) that the B-52s were very effective in hitting area targets such
as ammo and supply dumps but ineffective against point targets such as
dug-in tanks which is to be expected.