Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!nec-gw!netkeeper!dragon!koll From: koll@dragon.nec.com (Michael Goldman) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: 64-bits, How many years? Message-ID: <1991Mar20.162907.22485@sj.nec.com> Date: 20 Mar 91 16:29:07 GMT References: <1991Mar19.225915.17474@sj.nec.com> <8329@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> Sender: news@sj.nec.com Organization: NEC-AM TDD, San Jose, California Lines: 25 Nntp-Posting-Host: 131.241.12.43 Herman Rubin was kind enough to dignify my meanderings on electron states mapping to numbers resulting in molecule-sized CPUs with the thought that the Uncertainty Principle ("It's 10 femtoseconds O'clock! Do you know where your electron is?") would preclude combining high switching speeds with precision. All of which is true (as far as current theory goes), but the energy levels of valence electrons are quantized so that your precision would only have to be such that the photon sent is >= to the quantum necessary to jump to the next higher energy level and < that needed to go to the level above that. One could simplify it by having only 2 states per atom - base energy level = 0 and above base level = 1. While the speed would be limited, it would be orders of magnitude greater than the current solid state devices which rely on masses of electrons creeping over energy barriers. As for the point of state decay, this would map to the capacitor leakage of RAMs and require refreshing periodically. The same old problems but on a much smaller and faster scale. But maybe you still don't like this. How about another research area I read of some months ago, of using the relative positions of nodes on a long organic molecules to represent bits. The simplest case would be 2 atoms sticking out on a small chain like watch hands (watch hands? boy, does that date me). Each 90 degree relative position could be distinguished so that you could count to 4 on each 2 molecule chain. This would lend a whole new meaning to the term computer virus!