Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!hacgate!ashtate!dbase!garyc From: garyc@dbase.A-T.COM (Gary Carter) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Hayes Smartmodem 9600 troubles Message-ID: <1991Mar18.211318.22290@dbase.A-T.COM> Date: 18 Mar 91 21:13:18 GMT References: <3827.27d24b3a@hayes.uucp> <1991Mar5.093318.2146@llustig.palo-alto.ca.us> <3829.27d4d360@hayes.uucp> Reply-To: garyc@dbase.UUCP (Gary Carter) Organization: Ashton-Tate Lines: 38 In article <3829.27d4d360@hayes.uucp> tnixon@hayes.uucp writes: >> If you want good UUCP performance over a regular dial-up phone line, you have >> two choices: buy an non-Telebit modem and complain about lousy UUCP throughput, >> or buy a Telebit and save money and headaches. > >I strongly disagree. A full-duplex modem such as V.32 or V.32bis is >going to give you great UUCP performance; I'd even propose that a >V.32bis modem might give better performance than PEP. The only >benefit of PEP is smaller increments of data rate fallback on bad >lines. Other than this, Telebit has not been able to demonstrate The only benefit of PEP??? I have some small experience with PEP and V.32. Calling around Silicon Valley using a T2500 and a Microcom QX/V.32, occasionally I can't get a V.32 connection; other times, my V.32 connection will hang up after some length of time. Most of the time, it works great, and is much nicer than PEP for interactive use (such a running a text editor on the remote computer) - except for those unpredictable dropouts. But in my experience PEP NEVER FAILS TO CONNECT, and once connected, PEP NEVER DROPS OUT. It is totally reliable, industrial strength, a year-in year-out proven workhorse. Even for interactive edits, if the job is a small one, I will log in using PEP rather than V.32, in spite of the sluggish turnaround time, because of the absolute certainty that it will just work the first time. And for file transfers, I always use PEP. As for V.32, on the other hand, I simply cannot say the same. It is great, I use it a lot, but 99% just isn't quite the same as 100.0000. PEP may be proprietary, and Telebit may show a lack of "pep" with the standards committees, but that should not color an objective assessment of its virtues. __ garyc@dbase