Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!uupsi!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Funny mistake
Message-ID: <13487:Mar2116:27:0791@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 21 Mar 91 16:27:07 GMT
References: <15490@smoke.brl.mil> <1891@array.UUCP> <1991Mar21.021504.25553@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Organization: IR
Lines: 9

In article <1991Mar21.021504.25553@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@astsun8.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes:
> 2) Experiance has shown that having lint seperate from the compiler
> means that many people would not use it.

On the other hand, I was quite annoyed the first time I used gcc -Wall
that it still bothered producing an object file... cc and lint belong
together as much as cat and cat -t.

---Dan