Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!dsuvax!ghelmer
From: ghelmer@dsuvax.uucp (Guy Helmer)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: One more point regarding = and == (more flamage)
Message-ID: <1991Mar24.012959.9629@dsuvax.uucp>
Date: 24 Mar 91 01:29:59 GMT
References: <13603@helios.TAMU.EDU> <1991Mar22.161333.24290@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Organization: Dakota State University
Lines: 15

In <1991Mar22.161333.24290@dg-rtp.dg.com> hagins@gamecock.rtp.dg.com (Jody Hagins) writes:
>Well, I'm not Henry, but I definitely agree here!  Also, Borland seems
>to agree here as well, since while(*foo++ = *bar++); will generate a 
                                                    ^
>warning message.

It would be nice to have a compiler that would flag unintended empty
statements, too :-)

>Jody Hagins             
-- 
Guy Helmer                       | helmer@sdnet.bitnet
Dakota State University          | dsuvax!ghelmer@wunoc.wustl.edu
(605) 256-5264, (605) 256-2788   | uunet!dsuvax!ghelmer
Ahh, if weddings were as easy to design as software...