Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!markh
From: markh@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Mark William Hopkins)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Uses for process.h on IBMs under DOS?
Message-ID: <10474@uwm.edu>
Date: 24 Mar 91 04:55:18 GMT
References: <1991Mar18.181605.14265@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Lines: 8

In article <1991Mar18.181605.14265@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> consp06@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (Robert Konigsberg) writes:
>I know that DOS is not really a multiprocessing machine, so with that in
>mind, what uses could I have for process.h, and associated stuff?

Future compatibility with the envisioned multiprocessing 386/486-based
operating systems sounds like the most likely reason.

There are multiprocessing DOS's out there too, like Double DOS...