Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!haven!ni.umd.edu!uc780.umd.edu!cs450a03 From: cs450a03@uc780.umd.edu Newsgroups: comp.lang.functional Subject: RE: Applications for lazy functional languages Message-ID: <23MAR91.10585905@uc780.umd.edu> Date: 23 Mar 91 10:58:59 GMT References: <4682@osc.COM> Sender: usenet@ni.umd.edu (USENET News System) Organization: The University of Maryland University College Lines: 29 Nntp-Posting-Host: uc780.umd.edu Joe Keane writes: >First of all, laziness is not an `extra'. It exists in every language, it >just may not be apparent from the terminology. ... An interesting point, and a good one. [but later] >With the proper techniques, a lazy language can be faster than a traditional >one. Er.. by lazy do you mean a totally lazy language that never evaluates anything? Those are pretty fast, but um.... not incredibly useful. >I don't feel like explaining this in depth, since you could easily >write a book on it. Now THAT's what I call lazy! ;-) >Also, it's better to just do something, instead of describing how >you think it could be done. But that's not very lazy ?! >So for now, i'll just leave this as an unsubstantiated claim. Get some sleep, Joe. -- Raul Rockwell