Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3) Message-ID: Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC References: <814@optima.cs.arizona.edu> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 91 22:43:19 GMT In article <814@optima.cs.arizona.edu> gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) writes: > Xlisp is far from a toy, it is > more powerful than C (including C's standard libraries). For some definition of "powerful", perhaps. In my definition, which comes down to "how well does it cover the problems I want to solve" it's a toy. It doesn't even allow you to link to arbitrary libraries, for heavens' sake. > It is just a "toy" compared to other Lisp's. Like lisp 1.5? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"