Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:22903 comp.lang.c++:12384 comp.lang.objective-c:208 comp.std.c++:754
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.objective-c,comp.std.c++
Subject: Re: C++ and Objective C for the Mac
Message-ID: <71434@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 21 Mar 91 18:25:38 GMT
References: <1991Mar17.215614.29244@eng.umd.edu>
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 14

In article <1991Mar17.215614.29244@eng.umd.edu> darwish@eng.umd.edu (Mazen Mokhtar) writes:
|
|  I am also somewhat familiar with C++, but I know almost nothing about
|Objective C. I do not mean to start a C++ vs OC war, but could someone
|post or E-mail an overview of the main differences between them?
| 

Please follow-up on comp.object.  Each notes group comp.lang."xyz" is 
for the discussion of "xyz".  People who have been reading comp.lang."xyz"
for a while have already experienced *dozens* of these inter-language
notes wars, and still prefer "xyz".  Please let such people use comp.lang."xyz"
to discuss their chosen language, without having to rehash the arguments
for or against all other languages.  Whereas comp.object seems to be the favored
forum of people who enjoy these cross-language "discussions."