Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!rbj From: rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim) Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl Subject: Re: yacc stack overflow Message-ID: <126093@uunet.UU.NET> Date: 20 Mar 91 21:14:29 GMT Article-I.D.: uunet.126093 References: <1991Mar13.012932.1710@NCoast.ORG> <125497@uunet.UU.NET> <1991Mar20.005444.27907@NCoast.ORG> Organization: UUNET Communications Services, Falls Church, VA Lines: 39 In article <1991Mar20.005444.27907@NCoast.ORG> allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR) writes: >As quoted from <125497@uunet.UU.NET> by rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim): >+--------------- >| Of course. I'm surprised that someone who's been around as long as you >| have would even ask. It's done all the time. >+--------------- > >"Done all the time" != "okay to do". Look at how long the yacc and lex >sources were on the DECUS tapes.... Actually "done repeatedly in broad daylight" =~ "okay to do", at least in the civil world. It can be argued, and has been successfully, that failure to exercise one's rights is tantamount to releasing them. I know nothing of the DECUS case. >And AT&T is being extraordinarily obtuse of late. (Cf. the nonsense about the >"backing store" patent.) There is no money in hassling people who already have paid for source from posting diffs which can only be used by other people who have also paid for source. Whether the "trade secret" has been compromised in this situation is legally nebulous. Too delicate to risk an adverse legal decision on. They could actually make money from the backing store thing. Let us pray that they won't. However, there is no reason to confuse the two issues. >++Brandon >-- >Me: Brandon S. Allbery Ham: KB8JRR on 2m, 220, 440, 1200 >Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG (QRT on HF until local problems fixed) >America OnLine: KB8JRR // Delphi: ALLBERY AMPR: kb8jrr.AmPR.ORG [44.70.4.88] >uunet!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery KB8JRR @ WA8BXN.OH -- [rbj@uunet 1] stty sane unknown mode: sane