Xref: utzoo comp.mail.uucp:6128 news.admin:12825
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!bfmny0!tneff
From: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,news.admin
Subject: Re: UUPSI's new rules
Message-ID: <11565989@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Date: 19 Mar 91 02:43:58 GMT
References: <6LE25CK@taronga.hackercorp.com> <7H31y1w163w@phoenix.com>
Reply-To: tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff)
Followup-To: comp.mail.uucp
Lines: 12

In article <7H31y1w163w@phoenix.com> stanley@phoenix.com (John Stanley) writes:
>    As taronga.hackercorp.com is 'another organization' (neither PSI nor
>mine), I am prohibited from accepting mail from you, as I must receive
>it through UUPSI. However, UUPSI is supposedly selling me the ability to
>receive mail from other organizations through them. The latter is not in
>writing, though, and the former is. Which is correct? 

You are supposed to rely on PSI's good faith in enforcing, not what they
had you sign and date in ink, but what they generally sort of "meant."

Better not decide that what YOU "meant" is different from what you
signed, though!  That would be breach of contract. :-)