Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bbn.com!eneumann From: eneumann@bbn.com (Eric Neumann) Newsgroups: comp.music Subject: Re: hyperinstruments, VALIS, _Omni_ magazine Message-ID: <5333@archive.BBN.COM> Date: 22 Mar 91 14:37:38 GMT References: <9103180007.AA26001@en.ecn.purdue.edu> Sender: news@bbn.com Organization: BBN Lines: 41 In article <9103180007.AA26001@en.ecn.purdue.edu> davisonj@ECN.PURDUE.EDU (John M Davison) writes: > I must admit that I have not heard Machover's _VALIS_ yet; > some critiques of the opera would be welcome. I do remember > recoiling when I read a part of a _New_York_Times_ [I think] review > that compared it to _Tommy_...maybe that's why I didn't buy it. > > Also, what is this new "hyperinstrument" buzzword? Simple > folks like me are unaware of what exactly that term means, and if > that represents any significant conceptual leap over what the state > of the musical arts were before the term "hyperinstrument" was > coined. Explanations and commentaries would be very, very welcome. Tod Machover, I believe, is one of the finest, most promising and most innovative composers today. I say this coming from a strong classicist background, having high expectations for new music created and performed using new technologies, but not having been that impressed by much of what is currently out there. Too much of today's music is (at best) intellectually stimulating, but leaves you emotionally dead -- the next day after a performance, you can hardly relive the experience from memory! Tod is unique in that he truly does integrate lyricism with modern ideas and timbres/sounds in his work. He seems to have the right balance of musical ear and skill and techno-knowhow to compose pleasurable, contemporary music. As for the term "hyper-instruments", I must admit it sounds a bit trendy, but it represents a unique integration of real-time performance, MIDI control (of music and other expressive forms), and sonic environment structuring. I was fortunate enough to see a performance of his VALIS at MIT two years ago and was thoroughly impressed. The music moved me while the technologies dazzled me; you did not know what sonic treat was to be next ! The ease with which the piano changed from acoustic instrument to water-ambience was eerie ! From what I could tell, a Mac II was the sole integrating-computer in the performance, tying percussive instruments to pianos to synthesizers to lights. The programming of it was collaborately done by Tod and a graduate student, Joe Chung. I hope to hear a lot more of Tod in the near future, opera or suite ! -- Eric Neumann