Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!ames!pacbell.com!pacbell!m5!tma
From: tma@m5.COM (Tim Atkins)
Newsgroups: comp.object
Subject: Re: Shouldn't debuggers be able to debug dynamic objects?
Message-ID: <4681@m5.COM>
Date: 23 Mar 91 00:43:33 GMT
References: <1991Jan24.152256.24273@resam.dk> <1991Jan25.145947.16431@bellcore.bellcore.com> <1991Jan28.100213.1822@resam.dk> <1991Jan28.151241.25449@bellcore.bellcore.com> <40541@genrad.UUCP> <4578@m5.COM> <11550@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: tma@m5.UUCP (Tim Atkins)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Object Sciences Corp., Menlo Park, CA
Lines: 11

In article <11550@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> jbuck@galileo.berkeley.edu (Joe Buck) writes:
>
>Perhaps an implementation could be written this way, but both cfront and g++
>use only a single pointer per object, regardless of its class hierarchy.

Joe,

You quite simply do not know what you are talking about when it comes to
cfront.  I haven't tried g++ to check your contention there.

- Tim