Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!ncar!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!haven!mimsy!nocusuhs!nmrdc1!minixug!uwalt!waltje
From: waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org (Fred 'The Rebel' van Kempen)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: comp.os.minix splitup
Message-ID: <9103212058@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org>
Date: 21 Mar 91 17:24:15 GMT
References: <3+2AN33@xds13.ferranti.com>
Organization: MicroWalt Corporation, for MINIX Software Development
Lines: 15

peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) wrote:
> If Andy won't post to a moderated group, that pretty much shoots that
> whole idea down. :-<
Right.  His Master's Voice, eh?

> I don't see any difference between ".code" and ".sources", but if the name
> is important then I can go either way. In fact, I'll happily put whatever
> anyone wants in the CFD, including arguments against it. It is, after all,
> a Call for Discussion.
This has to do with "foo.sys.sources", and the "foo.sys.sources.d"
convention, I believe.  But what keeps us from using "comp.os.minix.software"?

Fred.
--
MicroWalt Corporation, for MINIX Development	waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org
Tel (+31) 252 230 205, Hoefbladhof  27, 2215 DV  VOORHOUT, The Netherlands