Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!midway!valley
From: valley@uchicago (Doug Dougherty)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: QEMM, etc Recommendation Sought
Message-ID: <valley.669780564@gsbsun>
Date: 24 Mar 91 02:09:24 GMT
References: <1991Mar21.173016.27609@ssd.kodak.com> <561@shograf.COM>
Sender: news@midway.uchicago.edu (News Administrator)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 14

jim@shograf.COM (jim morris) writes:

>Well QEMM & 386MAX will both do what you want. But in making
>your descision bear in mind that QEMM has one feature that 386MAX
>does not. It is one that I think is vitally important....

>That is that QEMM "pools" memory, so it will provide expanded or
>extended memory to whatever asks for it. This means that you do
>not have to decide at boot time how much extended memory to reserve.

Also QEMM supports loading the DOS resources high, something Qualitas
explicitly refeuses to get involved in.

BTW, I, too bought MAX first, then QEMM, so am legal for both.