Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:37423 comp.os.msdos.programmer:4166
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucivax!ddoherty
From: ddoherty@ics.uci.edu (Donald Doherty)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject: Re: difference 'tween microsoft c and quick c ?
Message-ID: <27E9CA04.7275@ics.uci.edu>
Date: 22 Mar 91 09:10:28 GMT
References: <2661@bnlux0.bnl.gov> <91080.224635BMS101@psuvm.psu.edu>
Reply-To: ddoherty@ics.uci.edu (Donald Doherty)
Organization: UC Irvine Department of ICS
Lines: 10

In article <91080.224635BMS101@psuvm.psu.edu> BMS101@psuvm.psu.edu writes:
>Quick C is MSC compatible the major difference is that you can only write for D
>OS in Quick and not the Windows Kernal nor the O/S 2 thing are supported(thing
>is appropriate for this time of night). Other than that and the size restrictio
>n there isn't much difference.

I use QuickC for Windows 3 programming.  Of course, you must own the
Windows SDK.

Don D.