Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uwm.edu!lll-winken!ubvax!igor!rutabaga!jls From: jls@rutabaga.Rational.COM (Jim Showalter) Newsgroups: comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Unlimited software warranties Message-ID: Date: 23 Mar 91 22:59:46 GMT References: <1991Mar12.015256.16098@ico.isc.com> <8024@rsiatl.Dixie.Com> <1991Mar13.021244.2538@ico.isc.com> <1991Mar16.171033.380@am.sublink.org> <12600@pucc.Princeton.EDU> <497@tivoli.UUCP> Sender: news@Rational.COM Lines: 10 >This actually raises a different but related question: when the lawsuits >begin, WHO IS AT FAULT? Can we distiguish between "at fault" and >"legally liable?" The corporate entity, as is true in any other product liability case. -- ***** DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are my own. Duh. Like you'd ever be able to find a company (or, for that matter, very many people) with opinions like mine. -- "When I want your opinion, I'll read it in your entrails."