Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!pasteur!cory.Berkeley.EDU!navas
From: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU (David C. Navas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Still no Ami businessware.
Message-ID: <12197@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 21 Mar 91 06:10:25 GMT
References: <39774@cup.portal.com> <39832@cup.portal.com> <1991Mar6.201318.11662@acd4.acd.com> <19656@cbmvax.commodore.com> <12017@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <19952@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 21

In article <19952@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes:
>In article <12017@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> navas@cory.Berkeley.EDU writes:
>>Sure, but Commodore is *not* performing its half of the dance.  WE can't
>>blame the engineers, they seem to be working very hard -- and if they had
>>twice as many, they might actually be able to get all the things they want to
>>get done, done in a reasonable amount of time.  
>
>No, actually, that would just double the number of things we want to get
>done, and the timeframes would remain the same.

Sure, and who exactly would complain if that were the case? :)

Perhaps I should restate and say if they had more folks, they might be able
to succeed at getting the things we would like to see get done... :) :)


>[Well put argument and here-here's deleted for brevity. :)]

David Navas                                   navas@cory.berkeley.edu
Signature erased, because it used to be something snide against the Mac. 
undergoing recnstrctn. [Also try c186br@holden, c260-ay@ara and c184-ap@torus]