Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!cc.tut.fi!s117986
From: s117986@lehtori.tut.fi (Salmij{rvi Janne)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
Subject: Re: MED 3.0 thoughts (was: MED 3.0 on ab20!)
Message-ID: <1991Mar19.105342.6833@cc.tut.fi>
Date: 19 Mar 91 10:53:42 GMT
References: <535@lysator.liu.se>
Sender: s117986@cc.tut.fi (Janne Salmij{rvi)
Organization: Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Lines: 21



> First of all, I disagree with the 'ugly' part. Secondly, MED gives you the
> MOST IMPORTANT FEATURE IN AMIGA SEQUENCERS EVER! (Totall ignoring the
> 'note' style editors such as sonic and DMCS, of course ;-):
but MED is no REAL sequencer... polyphony limited to 16 voices
Of course that is enough if you're running it with only one synth (like I do)
but still ... (Are those ALL sequencers (MIDI) programs you have ? If so you
haven't seen a sequencer on amiga yet). Music-X I'm using has no 'note' style
editor, insteads it has quite similar to that of those trackers. (More info on
same row of course)


> Note that these opinions are quite personal, since the feature in question is so utterly perfect for the type of music I do. Others may not find it as useful,
> but I love it!
Yep... so were mine and I have to admit that I'm a more NT/ST/PT-user, and they
are SO easy to use (at least newest versions). (personal opinion again) ;)


-- 
					Janne Salmij{rvi
					s117986@cc.tut.fi