Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!cbmnlux!cbmehq!cbmger!peterk From: peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: Question about WB 2.0 Message-ID: <993@cbmger.UUCP> Date: 21 Mar 91 08:36:55 GMT References: <19606@cbmvax.commodore.com> <19929@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1991Mar18.173012.4018@visix.com> <19955@cbmvax.commodore.com> <91079.091210GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> Reply-To: peterk@cbmger.UUCP (Peter Kittel GERMANY) Organization: Commodore Bueromaschinen GmbH, West Germany Lines: 15 In article <91079.091210GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu> GIAMPAL@auvm.auvm.edu writes: >I too have had this same problem with my local dealer. Something is wrong >here (two independant reports of dealers saying C= told them 2.02 had bugs). Oh boy, _every_software_has_bugs_ (as long as it is >1000 lines code). But 2.02 is a _real_improvement_ over any predecessor! You really should struggle to get it. Another issue is that there exist even newer beta versions (some call it 2.07), but these are restricted to developers, it's NOT a user's release. (Yet.) -- Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel // E-Mail to \\ Only my personal opinions... Commodore Frankfurt, Germany \X/ {uunet|pyramid|rutgers}!cbmvax!cbmger!peterk