Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!micor!latour!revcan!darren
From: darren@revcan.UUCP (Darren Morbey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m6809
Subject: Re: Speaking of 512K upgrades...
Message-ID: <148@revcan.UUCP>
Date: 21 Mar 91 17:41:46 GMT
References: <1991Mar4.151832.1@wharton.upenn.edu> <3176@batman.moravian.EDU>
Organization: Revenue Canada, Taxation; Office Communications Division
Lines: 12

In article <3176@batman.moravian.EDU>, halkoD@batman.moravian.EDU (David Halko) writes:
> In article <1991Mar4.151832.1@wharton.upenn.edu>, sirolly10@wharton.upenn.edu (Michael Sirolly) writes:
> > 
> > FOR X=1 TO 1000:WIDTH 80:WIDTH 32:NEXT X
> > 
A similar problem appeared in THE RAINBOW magazine.  Marty Goodman believed
that the problem was with the GIME chip -- 1986's were supposedly flawed.
If yours is dated '86, he advised putting in a later model chip (if they
are still available.)  I don't have the issue in my hand right now, but
I believe it was early 1989 when he wrote that (January or March.)  Does
it help?     Darren Morby.