Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!rusmv1!awsws4!zrfa0390
From: zrfa0390@awsws4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (U. Lang)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: What I'd LOVE to see in SGI's NQS...
Keywords: nqs
Message-ID: <1991Mar20.112324.17045@rusmv1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: 20 Mar 91 11:23:24 GMT
References: <1991Mar14.073500.11533@s1.msi.umn.edu> <1991Mar14.221446.14293@odin.corp.sgi.com> <1991Mar15.174247@igc.ethz.ch>
Sender: zrfa0390@awsws4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Organization: Comp.Center (RUS), U of Stuttgart, FRG
Lines: 64

In article <1991Mar15.174247@igc.ethz.ch> torda@igc.ethz.ch (Andrew Torda ) writes:
>
>Does the new nqs maintain SGI's incompatibility with respect to nqs
>running on other machines ?
>
>--
>Andrew Torda, ETH, Zurich

We would also like to see nqs on SGI's being compatible with CRAY, CONVEX,
IBM, etc. Currently we are not able to submit batch jobs from the SGI's
to our CRAY, Convex or IBM. We have ported the NQS version from Cosmic
on the IBM. We would prefer to use the SGI version of NQS on our Irises
instead of porting the Cosmic version on the Irises.

Ulrich Lang, University of Stuttgart Computer Center



M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
p
M
n
Ulrich Lang, University of Stuttgart Computer center