Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!nic.csu.net!csus.edu!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!npd.novell.com!newsun!tporczyk
From: tporczyk@na.excelan.com (Tony Porczyk)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: GeoWorks Ensemble: any comments?
Message-ID: <1991Mar19.054539.2001@novell.com>
Date: 19 Mar 91 13:09:01 GMT
Sender: news@novell.com (
Lines: 16

The News Manager)
Nntp-Posting-Host: na
Organization: Standard Disclaimer
References: <13085@helios.TAMU.EDU> <399@intuit.intuit.COM> <1991Mar18.031321.26035@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1991 05:45:39 GMT

In article <1991Mar18.031321.26035@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>, mroussel@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (Marc Roussel) writes:
> You're missing the point.  GeoWorks isn't supposed to compete with
> Windows on the more powerful machines, it's supposed to blow away
> Windows on the less well-endowed models.  Have you tried running Windows
> on an XT?

Blow away on an XT?  You can't blow a bubble-gum on an XT... :)
Frankly, I am afraid if they want to build a future on an XT, I am
not going to buy their shares...
Running Windows on an XT?  Is that a latest trend in S/M? :)

Tony