Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!emory!att!cbnewsh!cbnewse!cbnewsd!klotz
From: klotz@cbnewsd.att.com (david.a.klotzbach)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: MicroEmacs for Windows (Suggestions)
Message-ID: <1991Mar22.164711.21207@cbnewsd.att.com>
Date: 22 Mar 91 16:47:11 GMT
References: <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 21

From article <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu>, by cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI):
> From article <1991Mar20.211005.9480@isc.rit.edu>, by cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger):
>> In article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:
>> 
>> about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
> 
> Nope.  You can have ANY icon displayed for ANY file.  For instance,
>   ...
> change the icon in the File/Properties dialog.  If you wanna use an
> icon from another program, just specify that program's .exe file in the
> icon file name part.
> 
 
But the problem remains that the `iconized' icon for none windows programs
still remains the obnoxious `DOS' icon. This can not be fixed by
the properties command. The only Icon that the properties command
affects is the one shown in the group. 

If you have enough memory that you have several programs `iconized' it
would be nice if the icons would be different. Of course this only 
applies to DOS commands and not to Windows commands.