Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!rusmv1!suncvt13!claus
From: claus@suncvt13.verfahrenstechnik.uni-stuttgart.de (Claus Fleischer)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: Sun screenblank vs. X server screen saver
Message-ID: <1991Mar23.150246.28441@rusmv1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: 23 Mar 91 15:02:46 GMT
References: <2926@s5.Morgan.COM>
Sender: news@rusmv1.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (USENET News System)
Reply-To: claus@suncvt13.verfahrenstechnik.uni-stuttgart.de (Claus Fleischer)
Organization: Dep.Chem.Eng.(ICVT), Uni Stuttgart, FRG
Lines: 20

In article <2926@s5.Morgan.COM>, chuck@Morgan.COM (Chuck Ocheret) writes:
|> A few users in our Tokyo office are complaining that Sun`s screenblank
|> program and the MIT X server`s screen saver and interacting badly if they
|> both happen to kick in - that is the screen stays blanked no matter what.
|> I haven't observed this problem in several NY and London locations.
|> 
|> If anyone can shed some light please let me know.
|> 

If you start Sun's screenblank on your workstation in NY, and the
screen saver on your workstation in London, I think that 
shouldn't have any effect on all you workstations in Tokyo.

8-)

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Claus Fleischer, Inst.Chem.Verf.tech, Uni Stuttgart, 7000 Stuttgart 1, FRG
 INTERNET:  claus@suncvt13.verfahrenstechnik.uni-stuttgart.de
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------