Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!samsung!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!26!Jack.O'keeffe From: Jack.O'keeffe@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Jack O'keeffe) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: ANSI A117 standard Message-ID: <18290@bunker.UUCP> Date: 22 Mar 91 05:50:46 GMT Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP Reply-To: Jack.O'keeffe@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org Distribution: misc Organization: FidoNet node 1:129/26 - SoundingBoard, Pittsburgh PA Lines: 51 Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP Index Number: 14126 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] Wayne, these are a few points worthy of comment in the public review draft of ANSI A117 (enroute to you via snailmail, even as we type). 4.32 Auditorium and Assembly areas. Editorial committee had deleted requirement for assistive listening system (ALS) where amplification (PA system) is provided for hearies. Also they have altered wording of 4.32.6 to prohibit locating fixed seats served by ALS more than more than 50 feet from stage. (50 ft. viewing distance is great for speechreading oral presentations, but everything isn't oral, and it may be too close for movies, sports, concerts, etc.) Also the 50' MAXIMUM provision could be interpreted to outlaw whole house ALS in movie theaters, churches, etc. 4.29.5 Telephones, Equipment for HI people. After committee rejected reasonable proposal from AV task force, secretariat and editorial committee went thru cycles of confusion finally reverting to the archaic and inadequate language of the 1986 standard. We don't need A117 for a "magnetic field in the area of the receiver cap". Hearing aid compatibility is now required by federal law for all corded phones, with cordless soon to follow. We DO need amplified phones with minimum of +18dB, and accessible TDDs. The draft standard does not presently require thess, even for "accessible" public phones. 4.10.1.4 Elevators. A minor point perhaps, but shouldn't the visible signals provide all the same information that audible signals give? Wouldn't it be nice to know whether the elevator is going up or down before boarding it? 4.26.3 Visual Alarms. This is a well researched proposal developed by ATBCB based on work done by Applied Concepts. There was opposition in committee from NATO (no not the NATO you thought, this was the National Association of Theater Owners), but the proposal was adopted after a bit of struggle. Opposition may re-surface, so affirmative comments on this item would be most appropriate. A117 standard is open for comments until April 22. Whatever is adopted, we'll be stuck with for the next five years. Remember the disability advocates are outnumbered 3:1 in the voting membership of the committee, so we must depend on comments to make our position known. So everybody speak out - NOW! ... lllegitimii non Carborundum! -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!26!Jack.O'keeffe Internet: Jack.O'keeffe@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org