Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!ptimtc!rdmei!icspub!astemgw!kuis!aegis!davidg
From: davidg%aegis.or.jp@kyoto-u.ac.jp (Dave McLane)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: V.32bis and V.17 approved by CCITT
Message-ID: <DgHgZ2w163w@aegis.or.jp>
Date: 26 Mar 91 07:03:24 GMT
References: <1991Mar26.013055.12@nstar.rn.com>
Organization: Aegis Society
Lines: 20

larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:

> >> Larry Snyder (larry@nstar.rn.com ) wrote:
> >>
> >>  >Now - UUCP on these modems is another story - in the HST
> >>  >modem at best throughput is 350 cps, while V.32 on non
> >>  >v.42bis and non v.32bis connections runs around 880 cps.
> >>
> >>  ... which I consider decent throughput for what is essentially a 9600 bps
> >> modem, don't you?
>
> >OK, so you're kidding ... aren't you?
>
> nope - we're serious

Well, I guess everything has it's place.... I bought a USR DS but couldn't
get it to do more than 2400 BPS MNP over a long dirty link (to Tallin, Estonia
from Kyoto).

--Dave