Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!ria!uwovax.uwo.ca!telecom-request
From: motcid!ibbotson@uunet.uu.net (Craig Ibbotson)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: User's Evaluation of Handheld Cellular: Fujitsu vs Motorola
Message-ID: <telecom11.233.6@eecs.nwu.edu>
Date: 23 Mar 91 20:07:35 GMT
Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Organization: Motorola Inc., Cellular Infrastructure Div., Arlington Hgts, IL
Lines: 16
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 233, Message 6 of 12

john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) writes:

> I am certainly happy with mine. But buy it because it is good, not
> because it is "American".

I agree with you 100%.  My point was simply if there are two products
of equal quality, performance and price, I would buy the American
product.  Buying something just because it is "American", regardless
of quality, is rewarding poor performance if that product is not up to
snuff.

Any of you who are interested in a more detailed review of the
Motorola Personal Communicator should see this month's {Cellular
Business}; there is a review on page 74.  This month's cover story is
about cellular fraud, a topic which has been showing up here and in
comp.risks with increasing frequency.