Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!lll-winken!telecom-request From: FVEST@ducvax.auburn.edu (Floyd Vest) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Urban Legend? -- Caller IDentified Sues and Wins! Message-ID: Date: 26 Mar 91 07:16:00 GMT Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 23 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 244, Message 2 of 9 [23 Mar 91 21:16:42 GMT] William.Degnan@f39.n382.z1.fidonet.org (William Degnan) wrote: > From: jean@hrcca.att.com >> The story goes that a woman in Florida with "caller ID" on her > Well, it is unlikely it was Florida. I don't believe it has been > implemented there. The South Central Bell {Bell Notes} (phone bill newsletter insert) reported about three or four years ago that "entended custom calling" [read CLASS] services were being test marketed in a "central Florida" community. About a year-and-a-half ago they also reported that residential ISDN (they didn't call it that) was being test marketed a "central Florida" community. Why can't they test market thing like that here? Anyone know where this community is and what's being test marketed now? Floyd Vest Manager, Administrative Systems--Auburn University, Alabama USA Voice: +1 205 844 4512 BBS: +1 205 745 3989 FIDO: 1:3613/3