Xref: utzoo gnu.emacs.help:1583 comp.emacs:10409
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unreplyable!garbage
From: rms@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU (Richard Stallman)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help,comp.emacs
Subject: what is free (And many more postings!)
Message-ID: <9103252125.AA24275@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 25 Mar 91 21:25:07 GMT
References: <CPETTERB.91Mar25113550@mickey.es.com>
Sender: daemon@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu
Followup-To: gnu.emacs.help
Distribution: world
Organization: Gatewayed from the GNU Project mailing list help-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Lines: 13


    Both foundations make great claims, but use non-common usage definitions
    for their names to disguise their true identity and give the appearance
    of a much higher cause than they truely represent? :-)

I think the cause of freedom is much higher than that of reducing prices.

And since when did freedom cease to be a common usage of the word
"free"?

Anyway, let's move any further discussion of this issue to
gnu.misc.discuss.  That's the proper place to discuss your opinions of
the FSF's goals and policies.