Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!eldalonde!mckulka
From: mckulka@eldalonde.endor.cs.psu.edu (Christopher Mc Kulka)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: AT&T ODE
Message-ID: <.82Gz6p71@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 24 Mar 91 11:13:16 GMT
References: <27EC1A78.14249@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 26
Nntp-Posting-Host: eldalonde.endor.cs.psu.edu

In article <27EC1A78.14249@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca> cui@maccs.dcss.mcmaster.ca (Jun Cui) writes:
>I'm wandering if this version could support AT&T ODE.  I tried to declare
>a constant integer in a class:
>
>	class test {
>	  const int foo = 10;
>	  // other ....
>	}
>
>When compiling it using AT&T Concurrent C++, I was given a message 
>'error: initializer for member test::foo'.
>AT&T Concurrent C++ uses a different way to initialize a constant?

What you need to do is have a constructor like the following
	test::test() : foo(10) { // do something} ;
and remove the initializer from the class declaration.  This is the same across
all C++'s.

>jun.

	Chris
--
Just say *NO* to software patents & look-and-feel lawsuits.  Try competition.
If God had intended man to smoke he would have set him on fire.
There are two ways to write an error-free program.  Only the third works.
Chris McKulka (mckulka@bree.endor.cs.psu.edu)