Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!cgdisis.cgd.ucar.edu!kauff
From: kauff@cgdisis.cgd.ucar.edu (Brian Kauffman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: Fortran - our favorite language
Message-ID: <10819@ncar.ucar.edu>
Date: 28 Mar 91 21:42:59 GMT
References: <1991Mar20.195732.15376@appmag.com> <2218@cluster.cs.su.oz.au> <16149@chaph.usc.edu>
Sender: news@ncar.ucar.edu
Organization: Climate and Global Dynamics Division/NCAR, Boulder, CO
Lines: 21

In article <16149@chaph.usc.edu> echeverr@sal-sun8.usc.edu (The Black Sheep) writes:
>Excuse me, but is it just me, or is fortran a language so old it is becoming
>obsolescent?	Really, i just can't handle doing programs while tripping over
>small details and phantom errors from nowhere and tricky compilations and
>core dump after core dump after execution...
>
>	Please, answer me, enlighten me on my feelings toward f77...
>
>		... cuz i still think it s*cks!! :-p
>

I hope this is enlightening:

I use Fortran every day and the problems you mention are not problems for me.
I've also used C extensively, but for my needs, it wouldn't be worth the
effort to convert my models from Fortran to C.  It seems to be a recurring
theme that someone proclaims that Fortran sucks and we should all switch to
C (or whatever).  The bottom line is, for lots of folks, switching is not 
worth the effort, and quite possibly not even an improvement.

-Brian