Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!argosy!freeman
From: freeman@argosy.UUCP (Jay R. Freeman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Subject: Re: evaluating () should be an error
Message-ID: <1051@argosy.UUCP>
Date: 25 Mar 91 17:53:07 GMT
References: <1991Mar24.064144.4256@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Mar24.081427.26162@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: freeman@cleo.UUCP (Jay R. Freeman)
Organization: MasPar Computer Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 12

In article <1991Mar24.081427.26162@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> gat@forsight.jpl.nasa.gov (Erann Gat) writes:
>In article <1991Mar24.064144.4256@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> quale@saavik.cs.wisc.edu (Douglas E. Quale) writes:
>>Are there any scheme implementations that signal an error on evaluating () ?
>
>T gives a warning message.
>
>E.

So does Pixie Scheme.
                                    -- Jay Freeman

	  <canonical disclaimer -- I speak only for myself>