Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Path: utzoo!sq!dak
From: dak@sq.sq.com (David A Keldsen)
Subject: Re: evaluating () should be an error
Message-ID: <1991Mar28.034310.12352@sq.sq.com>
Organization: SoftQuad Inc.
References: <1991Mar24.064144.4256@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Mar24.081427.26162@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> <1051@argosy.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 91 03:43:10 GMT
Lines: 21


>>In article <1991Mar24.064144.4256@daffy.cs.wisc.edu> quale@saavik.cs.wisc.edu (Douglas E. Quale) asks:
>>>Are there any scheme implementations that signal an error on evaluating () ?
>>
>In article <1991Mar24.081427.26162@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov> gat@forsight.jpl.nasa.gov (Erann Gat) writes:
>>T gives a warning message.
>>
>>E.

freeman@argosy.UUCP (Jay R. Freeman) writes:
>So does Pixie Scheme.

PSI signals an error, although it can be compiled so that it does not.
(#define NONIEEE).

Dak
-- 
David A. 'Dak' Keldsen of SoftQuad, Inc. email: dak@sq.com  phone: 416-963-8337
"Tomorrow the world, and--" he calculated quickly--"on Friday the universe!"
That leaves the weekend free, thought Spelter.
	-- _Sourcery_ by Terry Pratchett