Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!ames!ucsd!ogicse!pdxgate!eecs!mwizard
From: mwizard@eecs.cs.pdx.edu (Craig Nelson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps
Subject: Re: QEMM, etc Recommendation Sought
Message-ID: <2056@pdxgate.UUCP>
Date: 24 Mar 91 09:02:41 GMT
References: <1991Mar21.173016.27609@ssd.kodak.com> <561@shograf.COM> <valley.669780564@gsbsun>
Sender: news@pdxgate.UUCP
Distribution: na
Lines: 18


>>Well QEMM & 386MAX will both do what you want. But in making
>>your descision bear in mind that QEMM has one feature that 386MAX
>>does not. It is one that I think is vitally important....

>>That is that QEMM "pools" memory, so it will provide expanded or
>>extended memory to whatever asks for it. This means that you do
>>not have to decide at boot time how much extended memory to reserve.

>Also QEMM supports loading the DOS resources high, something Qualitas
>explicitly refeuses to get involved in.

>BTW, I, too bought MAX first, then QEMM, so am legal for both.

	Count my vote too.  Never had a major problem with QEMM, and
fankly I like it's style.

	Craig (mwizard@eecs.ee.pdx.edu)