Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!camelback!volpe
From: volpe@camelback.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Function Argument Evaluation
Message-ID: <17868@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 25 Mar 91 12:54:06 GMT
References: <15538@smoke.brl.mil> <17809@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <15552@smoke.brl.mil> <1991Mar23.014442.24307@cs.ucla.edu>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: volpe@camelback.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe)
Lines: 19

In article <1991Mar23.014442.24307@cs.ucla.edu>, jon@maui.cs.ucla.edu
(Jonathan Gingerich) writes:
|>I'm confused.

Ditto.

|>If I understand
|>Doug's last answer, p may be either &x or &y after the statement, but I
|>don't see how this affects the value of (p=&x) and (p=&y) which would 
|>remain &x and &y (given the correct type of p).

Ditto, again.

|>Jon.
      
==================
Chris Volpe
G.E. Corporate R&D
volpecr@crd.ge.com