Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!apple!motcsd!starnet!sschaem
From: sschaem@starnet.uucp (Stephan Schaem)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why no 320*200*8? (was: Wake up, Commodore!)
Message-ID: <1991Mar24.203644.10678@starnet.uucp>
Date: 24 Mar 91 20:36:44 GMT
References: <Mar.19.21.42.42.1991.16538@remus.rutgers.edu> <2984@tpki.toppoint.de>
Organization: Starnet-Public Access UNIX-Los Altos,CA 415-949-3133, login:info
Lines: 6



It will not be has easy now , since the 256 word table would not be
consequtive with the 2.0 adition.
But I dont know why it wasn't done the first time? I alway wonder
why the cut down, since the gfx library only ask for it!