Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!orca!javelin.es.com!blgardne
From: blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Subject: Re: Nec 4D (was Re: <None>)
Message-ID: <1991Mar27.160259.23814@javelin.es.com>
Date: 27 Mar 91 16:02:59 GMT
Article-I.D.: javelin.1991Mar27.160259.23814
References: <1991Mar20.051030.23170@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> <12299@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <1991Mar25.010042.18142@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu> <2574@borg.cs.unc.edu> <1991Mar25.205429.8759@javelin.es.com> <1991Mar27.102945.545@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
Reply-To: blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Lines: 25

maxc1503@ucselx.sdsu.edu (David Tse) writes:
>blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner) writes:
>>mueller@handel.cs.unc.edu (Carl Mueller) writes:

>>>Also, what 15-31 (or greater) multiscan monitors definitely support
>>>interlaced video well?  I tried out a Packard-Bell (Samsung) monitor
>>>but it displayed the odd and even fields on top of each other with
>>>space between them.  What experiences do others out there have?

>>The Sony CPD-1302 works with interlace. The old NEC Multisync II
>>(JCP1401-P3A, or something like that) does not, it behaves exactly like

>but not one field on top of aonther, like 2 halfs, it just has high distortion
>and flickering in the 15.75kHz interlaced mode since it's the lower bound
>of the range. I'm using one now as I type, but in deinterlaced mode :-)

There may be some difference between our two NECs, but mine does indeed
display both fields on top of each other. Interlace is completely
unusable on it. So I "fixed" it by throwing good money after bad, and
bought a flickerFixer.
-- 
Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland  580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108
blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com     or    ...dsd.es.com!javelin!blgardne
DoD #0046   My other motorcycle is a Quadracer.         BIX: blaine_g
                        289 miles to go....