Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!viusys!uxui!unislc!dave
From: dave@unislc.uucp (Dave Martin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: SUN Monitors
Message-ID: <1991Mar28.204025.26717@unislc.uucp>
Date: 28 Mar 91 20:40:25 GMT
References: <1991Mar28.200922.22869@unislc.uucp>
Organization: unisys
Lines: 22

From article <1991Mar28.200922.22869@unislc.uucp>, by dave@unislc.uucp (Dave Martin):
> I LIKE my 1950, I don't see what all the screaming is about.  The other

O.K.  I see what all the screaming is about, Admittidly I didn't look at
things like dot-pitch, and convergance, and size stability (this one I have
noticed with the 1950).  However my 1950 has served MY needs quite well.

I have seen several other monitors mentioned but without prices mentioned,
or whether they support overscan correctly or not.  The overscan issue is
VERY important with me.  I never really looked at other monitors because
I purchased an educational 3000 system, which includes the 1950, but I've
also never regretted the 1950 from a user standpoint either.  The multisync
and the PS/2 monitor I looked at were scrounged from a computer lab to
use temporarily since 1950s were backordered at the time, neither monitor
matched the 1950 from a "pleasant to my eyes" standpoint.  The IBM
monitor produced crisper colors, but it also lost approx. a 1/3 of its usable
display space to an impossible-to-get-rid-of border.
-- 
VAX Headroom	Speaking for myself only... blah blah blahblah blah...
Internet: DMARTIN@CC.WEBER.EDU                 dave@saltlcy-unisys.army.mil
uucp:     dave@unislc.uucp or use the Path: line.
Now was that civilized?  No, clearly not.  Fun, but in no sense civilized.