Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!portal!atari!trh From: trh@atari.UUCP (T R Hall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Two New Computer Announcements - CeBIT Message-ID: <2885@atari.UUCP> Date: 27 Mar 91 19:23:29 GMT References: <1991Mar14.033302.10763@udcps3.cps.udayton.edu> <1991Mar17.095612.26923@ariel.unm.edu>, <2867@atari.UUCP> Organization: Atari Corp., Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 77 mc4c+@andrew.cmu.edu (Mark Choi) writes: >> As the designer of said notebook-ST(e), I have held off introducing >> the subject, but as long as you brought it up ... >> ... >Hey, guy, good work! > But... Why no monitor port, I want colour graphics! (1) >....And a floppy drive >is a must. almost all PC notebooks got 'em, and if Atari ever wants to >sell to anyone other than current atari faithful, they had better follow >the competition. (2) > ....DS/DD is archaic! We need 1.44 meg, not just for this >notebook, but for all ST/TT's. (3) > ....Also, without a cartridge port, >unless D.Small makes his internal emulator, there will be no Mac market. >This is too bad. (4) > ....I write this in the hope that enough (5) >external pressure will force a redesign. Hopefully, if I post this I won't have to repeat it too often: 1) I didn't include a monitor port for a couple of reasons: A) Power The graphics shifter/video drive circuitry uses almost as much power as the rest of the system put together. Since the machine is specifically designed for PORTABLE usage, I made the (fairly reasonable) assumption that you aren't going to carry a color/mono monitor around with you. B) Space Hey, I tossed out ANYTHING I didn't feel was required in a PORTABLE machine, to make the machine as small as possible. 2) If you look at the so-called competition (Intel-based machines) I think you will find that the "note-book" sized units include EITHER a floppy or a hard disk, but not both. Since this machine was mosty intended to allow desktop-ATARI users to take specific data/applications with them on the road, I felt that loading data/programs into the internal Hard Drive would not be a hardship. Would you rather carry a hard-drive machine, or a floppy machine with a bunch of floppies that you have to swap in-and-out? As far as data transfer, both the Notebook and Pad versions of the machines will include file-transfer software in the ROMS, transfering over parallel-ports to other ST's, and serial ports to non-ATARI machines (hopefuly with an existing protocol, so Atari won't have to write [shudder!!] MS-DOS software). 3) Look for high-density floppies, both in desktop machines and in an external (probably battery-operated) floppy drive for the ST notebook (or whatever its final name is). We may be slow, but we ain't Blind/Dumb. 4) Both the STPad and STBook have an "expansion" port that includes all address and data lines, bus control lines, R/W and a number of ROM select lines. ALL of the signals needed for the "cartridge port" are present on "expansion port", so a conversion device need only consist of two connectors, a PC-board, and a housing. I'm sure some enterprising developer will make such available at a reasonable price. Even better, maybe "cartridges" will be upgraded to take advantage of new features. 5) Maybe we should take a vote: Should we let everybody add their 2 cents to the design, increase the size of the machine, delay it a few months/ years, increase the price, etc? :) :) :) :) :) 8) 8) 8) 8^) 8^) 8^) Oh, incidently, in the reprint from Tom Harker (ICD) he mentions that the note-book machine has JEIDA cards. He was a little confused; The note-book machine has the hard-drive as storage, the PAD machine has JEIDA cards, but NO hard-drive (the pad is intended to be hand-held; one twist and BOOM! the hard-drive would crash). TRH [PLEEEEAAAASSSEE note the smileys above! don't send me votes/suggestions/etc; it's hard ENOUGH to get through my mail/news each morning.]